"Where are my notes, have they also gone on strike?" --High Court in Johannesburg judge Frans Kgomo on finding he had no stenographer during a public servants' strike, 12 August 2010
Last year I learned a lot about minority political movements, in particular how poor and marginalized people create influence politically and socially.
Because workers generally have little political power, strikes are often their only "weapon" to assert their demands.
South African workers in a variety of crucial sectors have recently gone on strike, including car manufacturing workers, transportation workers, home affairs and teachers. As a result, seven car plants have been temporarily closed, Metrorail has been flooded with demonstrations, immigration services have been closed temporarily, and schools have been empty for a week.
Obviously the intended effect of these strikes have been to cause attention and disruption, but (schools in particular) they have had disasterous effects as well. What kind of education can be provided in such a fragmented and disrupted environment? According to a recent article, Soweto schools have been the worst affected by the strike. (As South Africa's largest black township, Soweto is famous for the "Soweto uprisings" during apartheid when mass protests against government policies resulted in the deaths of rioters when police opened fire on 10,000 marching students.)
In environments where teachers feel they have no other political options but to strike, the effect is that pupils who want to learn cannot. The article quotes a Grade 12 student who said, "The teachers said we much come today. We were supposed to write a test and now the school is closed. That means I won't be writing today and that's bad for me."
In addition, on the first day of teacher strikes in Cape Town, seven cars were stolen in Tamboerskloof and a friend's apartment was broken into--which he attributes to kids (although this can't be proven yet).
Nelson Mandela writes in his autobiography, Long Walk to Freedom, that "[a] freedom fighter learns the hard way that it is the oppressor who defines the nature of the struggle," and essentially, the oppressed has no choice but to "use methods that mirror those of the oppressor."
Even though Mandela is speaking about fighting "fire with fire" and mirrors Malcolm X's famous "by any means necessary" speech, it provides an interesting backdrop to the teachers strike.
The teachers strike--perhaps effective, perhaps not--has the foreseen consequence of negatively effecting the education of their students. At what point is it worth it, to the detriment of uninvolved third parties? Are teacher's first responsibility to their students, or is (hopefully) creating policy and social change for the long run more important? Do teachers have other options instead of striking? Or has the "oppressor" defined the environment of protest so narrowly that teachers have no other choice but to strike?
